obvious choice
If you like what Nothing is doing with earbuds and want to get started, ear (1) is the default choice for most users. The earbuds have a clear design that lets you see inside and they sound incredible. Silicone ear tips ensure a tight seal for the earbuds, while ANC tunes out ambient noise beautifully. It also comes with his IPX4 rating, which is great for working out, and the case charges wirelessly. It feels heavy and sticks to your ears, but if you don’t mind the design, we recommend the ears in (1).
for
- Great design with a snug fit
- outstanding sound quality
- ANC works very well in daily use
- IPX4 rated
- wireless charging case
Against
- Doesn’t last as long as ears (sticks)
- No
- The case is easily scratched
good alternative
The ears (sticks) follow an interesting half-in-ear design that sits in the outer ear and lacks angled sound nozzles for a more relaxed fit. The cylindrical case is also unique and adds glamor to the design. That said, there are some issues. No ANC available, no wireless charging, low value earbuds, etc. But if you don’t like the fit of the ears (1) and want something lighter, the ears (sticks) are a good alternative.
for
- Lightweight design ideal for daily use
- Provides over 6 hours of music playback
- amazing sound quality
- IP54 rated
Against
- Missing ANC
- No wireless charging
- not so good value
Earless (1) vs Ear (stick): same thing
Why you can trust Android Central
Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Learn more about how we test.
Ear (1) and ear (stick) have many similarities, and aside from inconsistent naming conventions, nothing nailed the design overview in both earbuds. It shares a similar design on the stem where you can see the housing.
That said, the plastic chassis feels nice and durable. I’ve used both buds for a few months and they hold up well. The case is worth mentioning here as it adds a lot of character to each earbud. Ear (1) has a dimple on one side It has a square case with a rim, which is good for holding the earbuds. I like the design of the case and how easy it is to put it in my pocket, but the problem is that it scratches easily.
The ear (stick) has a cylindrical case and gives an elegant impression, but the pocketability is not good. We like the smooth twist action and attention to detail, but we like the more subdued design of the ear cases (1).
Both earbuds have some form of ingress protection, with ear (1) offering an IPX4 rating and ear (stick) with IP54. So while both earbuds have the same level of water ingress protection, the ears (sticks) are also dust resistant.
Now, when it comes to the sound quality itself, there’s a lot to like about both earbuds. It’s one. The Ear (Stick) delivers a full, rich sound that gives your ears plenty of appealing bass, great tone, and airiness (1).
Both earbuds sound great, but they obviously took some time adjusting the ears (sticks) and it’s noticeable when you use both earbuds side by side. I found both earbuds to be sufficient for streaming Spotify and YouTube via SBC.
Blank Ear (1) vs Ear (Stick): What’s the Difference?
Ears (1) follow a similar design aesthetic to most earbuds in this segment, offering silicone ear tips that fit snugly into your ear cavities. I like the design because it sticks firmly so it won’t slip even during a workout, and it’s light and doesn’t make you tired even after using it for a long time.
The ears (sticks) come with a spherical shell without angled sound nozzles, so they don’t stick to your ears. I wouldn’t say this half-he in-ear design is aimed at people who don’t like the fit in their ears (1). I’m not a big fan of this design, but I have to admit that the earbuds are not. It causes as much fatigue as your ears (1).
As for the shell design, the ear (1) has a glossy coat on the shell, the ear (stick) has a matte finish, and the ear (stick) has a slightly extended handle, making it easy to control volume and music playback. . A little easier. One of the drawbacks of this design, however, is the lack of a tight seal.
The key abbreviation is ANC. The Ears (sticks) have passive noise isolation which works well for most use cases, but the lack of ANC means they are not suitable for working in noisy environments. Ears (1) have no such drawbacks, and the earphones do a good job of adjusting for nearby noise.
But with no sound isolation, the Ear (stick) lasts over 6 hours on a single charge, easily an hour longer than the Ear (1). The case has enough charge for 22 hours of playback, so you only need to charge these earbuds once a week. For that matter, there’s no wireless charging here – the cylindrical case doesn’t allow for that.
Mute (1) vs Mimi (stick) Which one should I buy?
For my money I get an ear (1). You get great value for money and the earphones do a great job in all areas.The design is attractive, you get great sound isolation and great sound quality, and you won’t miss any extra features.
Ears (sticks) are good if you don’t like the fit of the ears (1), but know they’re not worth it. Nothing really hits me when it comes to the overall design and tuning of these earbuds, but they also miss a few areas. that should be included. If you want an all-rounder, get Ears (1).
I have only one problem. Ears (1) are not actually available in all markets. India is a key region for the brand and Ears (1) he will not be available after November 2022. ear (stick).
obvious choice
The ears (1) are well designed, providing a tight seal that’s perfect for your workout, delivering great sound and doing a great job of regulating ambient noise. All in all it’s a great value.
good alternative
The ears (sticks) are tuned fairly precisely and incredibly well. They miss out on some areas, but if you want a relaxed fit and the best sound quality Nothing has to offer, get these earbuds.
