Perhaps, as Davis and other archaeologists suggest, these people came by boat from Northeast Asia and traveled south along the Pacific coastline, setting up camps along the way. “The Pacific coast is the most likely candidate. There appears to have been exposed habitable land about 17,000 to 16,000 years ago,” said Great He, executive director of the University’s Basin Paleo-Indian Research Unit. One Jeffrey M. Smith says: of Reno, Nevada, who was not involved in the new research. “It could have been a shorter trip in some kind of vessel between exposed and habitable patches along the coast.”
However, this scenario presents some archaeological challenges. First, there are no ship remains from this period to suggest that people had the technology to travel from Asia to the Americas by sea. (I’m not saying boats didn’t exist, he was 60,000 years ago when humans reached Australia from Asia, and this probably required long-distance boats). Ice melted and sea levels rose, shifting the Pacific coastline and submerging potential artifacts.
why Whether exactly people traveled is also an open question, and perhaps unanswered. says. “These areas were connected by road, so it wasn’t like people said, ‘Okay, we’ll never see each other again’ on this ship.” People maintain contact with Asian communities. A slow process, while creeping up the Pacific coastline.
Davis and his colleagues do not know whether the groups in Japan and the Americas were genetically related. The similarities in generated projectile points may suggest a kind of ancient social network of technology sharing. “It doesn’t necessarily matter if the genes are the same,” he says Davis. “Meet someone from some other part of the world and you have his iPhone. You have the same technology as that person. It means you are genetically related.” not.”
It makes sense that when humans migrated from Asia to the Americas, they used similar launch points. “Bringing in the connection to northern Japan gave us a pretty good hypothesis about linking the Old World and New World assemblages at the same time,” says David, senior curator of North American archeology at the American Museum. Hurst Thomas says Natural history that was not involved in the study. It’s an early theory that needs criticism and further evidence, he added, “but I think it’s groundbreaking.”
Davis also thinks that this may not have been a singular connection between Asia and America at the time. and continued to maintain technological networks that spanned the oceans, adding even more interesting wrinkles to the highly complex history of the peoples of the Americas. It’s hard to tell much about how such a network performed in time and space from data points alone.
