A former Southwestern Virginia judge appointed by Gov. Glenn Youngkin to lead the Virginia Parole Board said this month that it is suffering from a lack of resources and secrecyDetails calling for a major overhaul of state agencies published a report.
so 28 page report To the governor, parole board chair Chadwick Dotson said how the General Assembly could reform the five-member committee that reviews petitions for the release of inmates and decides whether to grant or deny them. We have made a series of recommendations regarding
These recommendations include increasing staff for the agency, which has only 10 full-time and 29 part-time employees, adding another member to its board of directors, and the possibility of media interception. This includes conducting “semi-public” parole hearings where there are Dotson also said that parole board ballots are now a matter of public record and that even if state freedom of information laws make disclosure voluntary, staff are encouraged to provide as much information as possible in response to requests for information. I emphasized what I was instructed to do.
“In recent years, the Virginia Parole Board has operated largely behind the scenes, with board members making decisions in secret, shielded from public scrutiny,” Dotson wrote in the report. “Most recent boards did not meet regularly to discuss cases. Decisions were made by individual members in state offices, with no oversight. The reasons given for each no-or-no decision were boilerplate and offered little or no insight into the committee’s reasoning.”
To ensure public confidence in what the parole board is doing, Dotson said, officials “need to adopt the highest level of transparency.”
Jonkin made parole board reform a top priority A series of controversial parole decisions Created by the previous board during the term of former Democratic Governor Ralph Northam. A series of oversight reports by the State Inspector General’s Office, the previous commission, allowed victims and prosecutors to give meaningful input on how the release of inmates would affect them and their communities. He made it clear that he did not follow his own rules to do so.
Given the nature of parole cases, which may involve sensitive information from law enforcement and prison officials, some members of the Northam Administration have defended confidentiality regarding parole board procedures where appropriate. , expressed concern about possible retaliation if the process were made public.
Official Inquiry Report on Past Activities of the Parole Board almost completely edited In 2020, after former leaders invoked a blanket exemption from the Parole Board’s Transparency Act, arguing that information provided to investigators could not be made public.
After taking office, Youngkin fired all five parole board members working under Northam and replaced them with his own appointees. The Democratic-led state Senate blocked some of these appointments. partisan conflict After Republicans took the rare step of rejecting some of Northam’s eventual board appointments last year. members must be bipartisanly approved by the next Congress.
In one of its first executive orders, Youngkin called for a review of the parole board’s operations and asked Attorney General Jason Miyares to investigate alleged misconduct that occurred under the previous board. .
The Attorney General’s review does not appear to be complete. A Miyares spokeswoman declined to comment.
Dotson, a former prosecutor who also worked as a professor and dean of students at the Appalachian Law School, reports that the board he took over had a “significant amount” in both parole cases and pardon petitions. It is said that there was an unprocessed portion. It also points out that increasing the functioning of government agencies can come at a significant public cost.
“This is not government money, it is the money of all 8.6 million Virginians we serve, and we must never forget that,” Dotson wrote. “At the same time, it must be recognized that the institution has been left to dry up and that it has contributed significantly to the turmoil surrounding the VPB in recent years. But the reality is that parole board case numbers continue to rise, stressing staff, mostly part-time employees.”
Virginia largely abolished parole in 1995 as part of the then-government’s “Truth in Sentencing” initiative. George Allen. Inmates sentenced before that law are eligible for parole, and Dotson said the state has seen a steady increase in the number of older inmates eligible for geriatric parole.
Dotson’s proposal would add a sixth member of the parole board so that members could “conduct hearings federally” rather than leave the process to part-time parole examiners. includes doing
“Media will be permitted to request access to public hearings to ensure full transparency,” Dotson wrote.
A more robust parole review process would require more staff and, in some cases, an independent parole board office and information technology independent of the Department of Corrections, on which the board currently relies for much of its administrative functions. you need a system. A drawback of certain computer systems is the drop-down menu from which board members must select common reasons for granting or denying parole.
State investigators say the report also recommends a number of ways to prioritize information from victims and prosecutors.
In Monday’s news release, Youngkin praised Dotson for working to improve a government agency that “undermined public confidence.”
“While there is still work to be done, I am proud that Chairman Dotson and the new board have implemented changes to ensure that victims and their families are taken into account, that they are more transparent and that they comply with the law. I think,” Youngkin said.
The 2023 session of the General Assembly begins on Wednesday.
Morning headlines delivered to your inbox
