‘To Leslie’ Oscars controversy, explained

Just years after giving Best Picture to the wrong movie(opens in new window)the surprise nomination may be withdrawn before the Oscars air on March 12.

One of the more shocking facts when the Academy Award nominations were announced last week was that Andrea Riseborough was nominated for her role. to Leslieif you haven’t heard of to Leslie, don’t worry; the film earned less than $30,000 at the box office. It was a small independent production about a single mother who won the lottery, and during the Oscar voting period, many Hollywood bigwigs like Edward his Norton and Kate his Winslet had this movie in a grassroots campaign. publicly supported.

Related item:

2023 Oscar nominations dominated by first-time acting nominees

That’s all right, right? After all, box office success has nothing to do with the quality or performance of a film. However, according to the Academy, there could be something wrong with the whole situation.per deadline(opens in new window)the organization released a statement on Friday announcing a review of its nomination process. It did not name Riseborough to Leslie Directly, but everyone seems to agree that’s what the statement says:

The Academy’s goal is to ensure that award competitions are conducted in a fair and ethical manner, and we are committed to ensuring a comprehensive awards process.

We are reviewing our campaign procedures for this year’s nominees to ensure we are not violating our guidelines and to let us know if the new era of social media and digital communications requires changes to our guidelines.

We believe in the integrity of our nominating and voting procedures, supporting true grassroots campaigns to achieve great results.

It is unclear what rules were broken here.Academy has a long list of guidelines(opens in new window) For the nomination process, but it does not provide smoking guns. vanity fair(opens in new window), some Academy voters were contacted with offers to watch the film and support online. This could theoretically violate the Academy’s lobbying rules.

For reference, no Academy Award nominations can Canceled, but rare.The handful of times it happened was usually related to something like the movie premiered on TV before it hit theaters, or the movie came out in the wrong year. high quality to LeslieIn your case, the nomination for Best Original Song was withdrawn.(opens in new window) In 2014, songwriter Bruce Broughton sent an email to Academy members during the voting period.

The Academy will meet on Tuesday, vanity fair It also reported that the nomination is unlikely to be revoked.

Apart from its amazing properties, to Leslie We’ve found its way into Oscar history, but there are other angles to the controversy. vanity fair According to the report, Riseborough (white) was nominated and black actresses for high-profile roles like Viola Davis were nominated. queen Or Daniel Deadweiler to left behind.For institutions with a notable history of disrespecting black women(opens in new window) It’s easy to see why some people aren’t happy with the Riseborough nomination, especially from that perspective.

Some people may feel that to Leslie Unfairly punished for the crime of not being mainstream enough. Despite having a long and well-reported history, the bigger movies are receiving a level of scrutiny that shouldn’t worry them.(opens in new window) How many movie studios are behind the scenes political maneuvering during awards season.

no matter where you land to Leslienominations, or at least those who care more about the Oscar drama than the actual awards, have something to worry about this year as well.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *