Walter Zerla via Getty Images
For example, let’s say you’re a manufacturer of computer graphics cards and your environmental credentials are being questioned by investors. you know what to do Email various departments and ask them to tally their carbon emissions and energy consumption. Simple enough. You write a report that promises a more sustainable future where trucks are electrified and solar panels adorn offices.
Good start, investors say. But what about the mines that produced the tantalum and palladium in transistors? Or the silicon wafers that arrived via a long supply chain? Do you want to install it or run it 24/7 in your data center to train AI models like GPT-4 (or 5)? If he cornered carbon dioxide by tonnes, the emissions companies would produce would be many times higher than first thought.
As part of efforts to uncover hidden emissions in product lifecycles, there are increasing calls to require companies to implement rigorous carbon accounting processes. The US Securities and Exchange Commission, the regulator of Wall Street, claims that every tonne of carbon emitted is a risk investors should know about. This is because future carbon regulations around the world could lead to costs and disruptions, which could alienate customers and employees. Worried about climate change. Last year, government agencies proposed a rule that would require most large companies to keep track of all emissions, including those hidden deep in their supply chains, and is expected to be finalized next month.
California politicians are making parallel efforts to force both public and private companies operating in the state to confess to the full extent of their emissions. The motivation is not just to help investors, but to force companies to admit the damage they have caused and to help consumers sniff out false sustainability claims. The proposed rule would require about 5,000 companies with more than $1 billion in revenue to report their emissions to a public database.
San Francisco state senator Scott Weiner imagines standing in the grocery store and being able to quickly see the emissions of companies selling “climate-friendly” or “low-carbon” products. By forcing companies to make full disclosure, he hopes greenwashing will fade away and “boost giants to do whatever it takes to decarbonize their supply chains.” . For example, a bank investing in a carbon-intensive business may think twice before doing so if its customers can easily compare its operations with its competitors.
Cynthia Hanawalt, a senior fellow at Columbia University’s Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, says demanding these disclosures could wash away the true scale of companies’ emissions. Most are now hidden from view. “Right now we have a very bullshit system with inconsistent voluntary reporting,” she says. “It’s not helping anyone, except perhaps the fossil fuel industry.”
